How to burn a CD to ashes using Mac OS

The Apple Hype unleashed part 1: How to burn a CD to ashes.

My girlfriend frankly doesn't know a thing about computer technology. And she's not very interested in that, too. She's in medicine and doesn't need all that stuff. That's why she owns an Apple iBook and and iPhone. Sounds logical, deosn't it? It's because of all the nice design, the nice apps, all this stuff. And: It's far more intuitive than the ugly windows boxes! Well, she left her "old" (3 years old) iBook in my flat, and as a notorious person I gave it a try. Since Mac OS is THE OS that everybody is supposed to understand (while Windows is far too complicated) I just wanted to find out how Mac OS (Snow Leopard) feels and started testing some stuff.

Let's start with something simple, such as copying a CD-ROM. I just got some funny stuff from a colleague of mine, and tried the best to copy this CD with the MacBook. Should be easy, intuitive, nothing to worry about. After hitting the CD symbol I found the "Burn to CD/DVD" somewhere. Sounded really easy. So I followed the instructions. Apple urged me to enter a blank CD. Sounded odd to me, since I would have expected this step after the source CD was read. Well: They wanted the blank CD right now. Which I frankly provided. And it started working. I was wondering whether the whole source CD was already cashed before or what he was doing. And it did what I had been afraid of: It burned a CD without any content, but the title of the CD to copy. Incredible. What a mess.

I looked at the Apple help, which provided the solution. You have to look for some "hard disk xxx tool", hidden far beneath some "service programs" folder, which provides functionality to draw an image from the CD. Sounds very logical to me. I mean I am a Software developer, of course I know what images are and what they're used for. But "normal" users with no affinity to computers? I can't belive it. So my first impression is:



  • Mac OS is far from being logical or easy to use
  • Maybe it's easier to use than Windows NT, but it's definitely not when compared to Windows 7 (in my eyes).
  • I would claim this to be a bug: Being able to burn a CD and creating an empty, finalized CD like this. This functionality makes no sense at all.
  • This is my first impression that all the Apple hype is for Apple nerds only. I'm sure I'll find further things... But go ahead, I don't want to draw anybody from spending more then twice for the same hardware and getting an OS which leaves questions. Fortunately you can set up Windows on those boxes now... ;-)


To make it clear: I'm far away from being a Windows Adept. I'd prefer open source such as Linux. But it's funny to me to see the OS of the "elite" and its severe failures.

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Bild
Apple Vision Pro: A Game-Changing Headset Revolutionizing AR/VR Source: Apple.com   by Stefan Roth Now, with the new Apple Vision Pro , everyone is writing reviews about a device that hardly anyone has had the chance to test firsthand. It may seem odd and amusing at the same time, but considering the anticipation and high expectations surrounding "this Apple device," it's not entirely surprising. So, should you dismiss this as just another article? As someone who became captivated by augmented reality in 2014, I've spent nearly a decade exploring various devices and tracking the evolution of this technology. Perhaps it is this experience and my penchant for thinking outside the box that has allowed me to identify some key points about the new Apple Vision Pro—a potential game changer that many others have yet to recognize. My initial impression was somewhat underwhelming. Showing 2D apps within a 3D space? Come on, we could already do that with the HoloLens-1 . I have
Mehr anzeigen

HTML5 vs. Silverlight aka Ajax vs. Java Applets. A trip in the time machine

Yesterday I attended the Keynotes to the Mix developer Conference in Las Vegas via Live Stream. They showed quite amazing stuff there using HTML5 with hardware acceleration in IE9. Folks at Microsoft really seemed to scorn Google's Chrome - showed up several Demos where Google Chrome was lame and IE9 kicked ass. Was quite funny but that's not what made me write this. I attended the keynotes to see where the Microsoft trip goes to. At my current company Krones I have the task to propose a graphic framework for the future. There are lots of native applications, some using Win Forms, some even using old VB. Others are ASP.NET applications and run in the browser only. We'll have to port these applications and find a common graphic plattform for them: Or almost common. Some time ago I hit the PRISM framework making it possible to have one architecture for your WPF and Silverlight applications under the hood. I made some small steps with Silverlight 3 in 2009 and was quite am
Mehr anzeigen

Using the MOQ framework to compare objects or: why equals are (not always) equal

In our current project we try to use the MOQ framework in order to mock away database accesss in our business logic tests. I was testing some business logic where the executed method would compare different objects and aggregations of objects with each other in order to behave one way or the other. The method builds intersections of collections using the Except extension method and stores intermediate values in lists using the Equals method. Some first tests were successful where the database wasn't mocked. Introducing mocks made me bang my head on the table because of two reasons at least: Getting used to the "over-Lambda'd" syntax of MOQ and trying to guess what was really meant on the MOQ QuickStart page . The documentation is rather sparse and a lot guess work and learning-by-pain seems to be the best way to get along. At least after some time you get along with the syntax and even start to like it. Lists don't behave like they behaved before. WTF! Compare
Mehr anzeigen